I suppose the appeal might depend a lot upon the 'mission statement' of your ride. The mission statement of city cases is not long distance touring, which is sort of a traditional image for airheads. The traditional bags (BMW, Krauser, Hepco Becker) are a bit bulbous hanging out as they do (though the rider's legs hang out about the same amount). City cases are more compact (of course) and to my eye sort of emphasize the 'go fast' image of an S or RS bike. (This is, of course, in my head, but I reckon others as well.) On a day trip city cases are all you need to carry things such as water, a hat when you're not wearing your helmet, different gloves, a camera, and a lot of things that don't come to mind at this instant.khittner1 wrote:Ken--I've never understood the appeal of the "city cases"---only big enough to hold a lunch bag, and they look like someone pasted the box from a portable jig saw or drill onto the side of a bike. They do, however, beat the aesthetics of the .50 cal ammo cans that festoon most current GS suburban "adventure" bikes . . .
Plus if you have both city cases and 'standard' BMW or Krauser bags, you can slap on whichever you prefer for a particular ride.
And then there are the top cases (behind the seat) which most people abhor. (Hi Duane!) But if you understand the concerns about carrying dead weight high and to the rear on a motorcycle you can get along with them just fine. In my case (no pun intended) I contrived a quick disconnect method allowing near instant removal of the top case from the luggage 'rack'. Top cases are good for a trip to the book store for some reading material, or a grocery store for a 6 pack of beer and some salty crunchy things. Plus inexperienced ladies seem to enjoy the apparent virtue of not being able to fall off the back of the motorcycle. One thing you're positively not allowed to do is to somehow mount a top case to a RS.
Ken