This or that?

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Soon
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:10 am

This or that?

Post by Soon »

Hello people of the world,


I need some help and needed to come to the experts. I am looking at two Airheads and need to understand the differences so I can make the best decision.

I am looking to purchase an airhead in the near future with the intentions of turning it into a scrambler.

The two options I have at the moment are a
R80 - 1991 OR
R100R 1992

From my understanding the frame is larger on the R100R? and also has larger profile tyres and longer forks. What do you think will be better for my project? If I was to purchase the R100R I would need a new tank because it is ugly.

Any thoughts and insight would be largely appreciated.
User avatar
SteveD
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:29 am
Location: Melbourne, Oz.

Re: This or that?

Post by SteveD »

Velcome! ;)
I woulda thought the 800 would give a lighter setup for a scrambler. It would also have the less troublesome monolever swingarm. The 100r has the paralever.
If you're tall and beefy, it probably wouldn't matter.
Cheers, Steve
Victoria, S.E.Oz.


1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
ME 109
Posts: 7313
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:00 am
Location: Albury, Australia

Re: This or that?

Post by ME 109 »

SteveD wrote:Velcome! ;)
I woulda thought the 800 would give a lighter setup for a scrambler. It would also have the less troublesome monolever swingarm. The 100r has the paralever.
If you're tall and beefy, it probably wouldn't matter.
I like the twinshocks a lot, so the mono would be a good choice for a scrambler. ;)
Lord of the Bings
User avatar
grant81rs
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:06 am
Location: Gippsland - Australia

Re: This or that?

Post by grant81rs »

Gidday.

We need more Mono scramblers out there... 8-)
Cheers, Grant
Gippsland - Australia

1978 R100RS
1981 R100RS
1994 K1100RS
2005 R1150gsa
User avatar
Soon
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:10 am

Re: This or that?

Post by Soon »

Does the R100R run larger wheels? I want to run fat beefy wheels.
SteveD wrote:Velcome! ;)
If you're tall and beefy, it probably wouldn't matter.
I'm not tall, a little beefy! so will it matter at all? is it better for easier service to avoid the Paralever swing arm?
ME 109 wrote:I like the twinshocks a lot, so the mono would be a good choice for a scrambler. ;)
Both the bikes I'm comperiong seem to be Mono shocks?
User avatar
Soon
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:10 am

Re: This or that?

Post by Soon »

Image

Image
User avatar
SteveD
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:29 am
Location: Melbourne, Oz.

Re: This monolever or that paralever?

Post by SteveD »

http://www.largiader.com/paralever/
http://forums.bmwmoa.org/showthread.php ... -Monolever

http://www.bmbikes.co.uk/specpages/R100R.htm
R80 mono wheels and tyres.
Wheel Rims, Front.MTH 2.50 x 18 E

Wheel Rims, Rear.MTH 2.50 x 18 E

Tyres, Front 90/90 18 51 H

Tyres, Rear. 120/90 18 65 H

R100R
Wheel Rims, Front. 2.50 x 18 MTH 2

Wheel Rims, Rear. 2.50 x 17 MTH 2

Tyres, Front. 110 / 80 V18

Tyres, Rear. 140 / 80 V 17
Cheers, Steve
Victoria, S.E.Oz.


1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
Post Reply